Skip to main content

Ex. IB officer R.N. Kulkarni’s death shrouded in a mystery


S.M Mushrif is former Inspector General of Police, Maharashtra.

His comment:

"R.N. Kulkarni, Ex. IB officer, who worked in IB for 35 years was killed purportedly in a motor accident on 4 Nov. 2022 in Mysore. Mr. Kulkarni was on an evening walk. Seeing a speeding car approaching him, he stepped aside and avoided the car. But the car came back and gave him a heavy knock, tossing him in the air and he was killed. The car was without a number-plate "

"Initially, it was reported that it could be a hadiwork of Jihadis, as he had written a book “Fact of Terrorism in India.” But soon this theory was changed and OpIndia publicized a different story. It was reported that Mr. Kulkarni had a serious dispute with his neighbour over an illegal construction and the latter’s goons had been following him for quite some time. As the neighbour was thus, seriously suspected, he and his two sons were arrested by the police. The police commissioner, however, clarified that the police have been exploring all possible angles."

"In fact, Mr. R.N. Kulkarni had a stiff and long standing animosity with the IB. He had written a book ‘Sin of National Conscience’ criticizing the working of the intelligence agency. He had also filed a petition in Karnataka High Court, Bangalore (PIL Civil No. 16075/2011) seeking clarification about IB’s legal status. But that was dismissed and he filed a Special Leave petition in the Supreme Court. That was also dismissed and ultimately he filed a review petition which was also eventually dismissed on 12 July 2016 by the bench comprising J. Dipak Mishra and J. Shiva Kirti Singh. But it appears he had not given up and had been staking the IB."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...

India needs a Second National Capital

Metta Ramarao, IRS (VRS) India needs a Second National Capital till a green field New National Capital is built in the geographical centre of India. Dr B R Ambedkar in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States" published in 1955 has written a full Chaper on "Second Capital for India" While discussing at length justfying the need to go for a second capital has clearly preferred Hyderabad over Kolkata and Mumbai. He did not consider Nagpur. Main reason he brought out in his book is the need to bridge north and south of the country. He recommended Hyderabad as second capital of India. Why we should consider Dr Ambedkar's recommendation: Delhi was central to British India. After partition, Delhi is situated at one corner of India. People from South find it daunting to visit due to distance, weather, language, culture, etc. If Hyderabad is made second capital, it will embrace all southern states. People of South India can come for work easily. Further, if Supreme Court...