Skip to main content

PARTITION: BLAME IT ON NEHRU!


From Daniel Ovelz Michael

BLAME IT ON NEHRU!

✪ In the photo the All India Congress Committee delegates are seen voting for Partition. 
✪ Nehru, Pant and Prasad are visible.
✪ But all the blame befalls Nehru time and again for the partition.
✪ The AICC could have rejected the partition if Congress was so against Partition.
✪ It was Rajagopalachari and Patel, the first ones to accept partition.
✪ And again Sardar Patel was the one who prevailed over that if the Sub Continent had to be partitioned then Punjab and Bengal too would have to be partitioned. As both the provinces had vast proportions of Hindus districts along with the predominantly muslim majority districts.
✪ Jinnah had expected that the Hindu districts of Punjab and Hindu districts of Bengal would get transferred to Pakistan as parts of one same province.
✪ When Jinnah did not get the desired Pakistan he termed it as Moth eaten Pakistan. He had even demanded that a corridor connecting west Pak and east Pak be created accross India. Which rightly got rejected at the outset by Mountbatten.
✪ Sarat Chandra Bose and Suhrawardy wanted Bengal to remain united and independent with Calcutta as capital.
✪ If united Bengal was approved as independent nation then perhaps even a United Punjab with both Muslim and Hindu areas together would have emerged as Independent nation then perhaps Jinnah would have been left with Sindh and Balochistan as Pakistan.
✪ But the British were determined to create a large Pakistan with two wings - east and west if not in one territorial extent.
✪ The question is did the British wanted to divide India or divide the Muslims?
✪ The Indian Muslims of the Subcontinent were the largest muslim population amongst all muslims of the world.
✪ The British never wanted another monolith Muslim population nation to emerge in the world. 
✪ They demolished the Ottomans and wanted the Arabs to dominate the Muslim world.
✪ The British knew it thoroughly that creation of Pakistan wont be perfect and wholesome!  as many muslims would stay back in Hindu India and would not migrate to Pakistan. 
✪ The British knew it eventually that East Bengal would sooner than later emerge as an Independent Nation. The artificial nation would crumble in time.
✪ Hence the Partition of India would actually be the division of Muslims of the Subcontinent into three divisions i) Muslims of India, ii) Muslims of West Pakistan & iii) Muslims of East Bengal.
✪ The British wanted to control the oil rich Arabs and make the Arabs to emerge as the main force of all Muslims in the world.
✪ Therefore it's important to understand the British design in Partition of the Subcontinent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...
Post a Comment
Read more

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI & Higher Education: The Empty Classroom

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE & HIGHER EDUCATION The Empty Classroom When students outsource learning to AI and companies cut the engineers who know better, both ends of the talent pipeline fray at once. India is not watching from a safe distance. Chuppala Nagesh Bhushan At the University of California, Berkeley, something unremarkable happened in spring 2026: a professor held office hours. The unremarkable part was that nobody came. Dan Garcia, who teaches CS 10, a broad introductory computing course popularly called “The Beauty and Joy of Computing,” found his calendar conspicuously clear at the very moment his gradebook became conspicuously alarming. Of the students who sat CS 10’s final examination, 35.3% received an F—five times the historical norm of roughly 7%. Two other courses in Berkeley’s elite Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences department suffered similarly: 10.6% of CS 61A students failed, and 16.8% of those in EECS 127, an upper-division optimi...
1 comment
Read more