Skip to main content

When constructing Biography of a person follow these three laws*

🔴 *When constructing  Biography of a person follow these three laws*
__________________

📌 *One, first look for sources other than those emanating from your principal character.* So Elwin wrote 40 books, 400 newspaper articles, 4,000 letters and likewise with Nehru, Gandhi or Ambedkar. You can write the whole book based on what they have said – so look for sources that come from a second party, a third party, a 10th party which may be a friend or admirer. That’s the first law.

📌 *The second law is that the relationship with secondary characters illuminates the principal character.* So if you write about Ambedkar, there will be a light on Gandhi, right? If you look at their interaction or Nehru and the Hindu right, that is the second law. Pay adequate attention to the secondary characters, don’t just focus on the principal character.

📌 *The third law is always go chronologically*. A life is lived forward but understood backwards, but he has lived from day to day. So for example, in the case of Elwin, he was a celibate because of Gandhi, but then he became flagrantly exalting sex. But let that slowly develop. Don’t say – because the reader is saying ‘what an idiot to follow Gandhi in brahmacharya‘, and you as an admirer want to say, actually he later changed his mind, but don’t. Keep the reader in suspense. If you’re a sociologist or an economist, you tend to state your thesis quite early. This is a book about inequality, so the reader already knows the inequality is growing or something, right? Here the suspense because that’s how life is – unpredictable, unexpected. So these are the three laws which in retrospect I realise only apply to the biographer of a modern person where the sources are rich enough. So that’s what Patrick means when he says that he violates them.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...
Post a Comment
Read more

List of Padmashali Family Names and Gothras

 List of Padmashali Family Names and Gothras   S.No Family Name Gothra A :     1 Aabopu Purushothama 2 Aachanthi Gaargeya 3 Aacharam Bruhaspathi 4 Aadanamu Dhamodhara 5 Aadelli Angheerasa 6 Aadepally Chyavana 7 Aadepu Pourusha 8 Aadetla Kashyapa 9 Aadham Bharadwaja 10 Aadhamamu Dhamodhara 11 Aadhanamu Dhamodhara 12 Aadhanoori Keshava 13 Aadhanooru Keshava 14 Aadhellam Angheerasa 15 Aadhelli Aathreya 16 Aadhem Bharadwaja ...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI & Higher Education: The Empty Classroom

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE & HIGHER EDUCATION The Empty Classroom When students outsource learning to AI and companies cut the engineers who know better, both ends of the talent pipeline fray at once. India is not watching from a safe distance. Chuppala Nagesh Bhushan At the University of California, Berkeley, something unremarkable happened in spring 2026: a professor held office hours. The unremarkable part was that nobody came. Dan Garcia, who teaches CS 10, a broad introductory computing course popularly called “The Beauty and Joy of Computing,” found his calendar conspicuously clear at the very moment his gradebook became conspicuously alarming. Of the students who sat CS 10’s final examination, 35.3% received an F—five times the historical norm of roughly 7%. Two other courses in Berkeley’s elite Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences department suffered similarly: 10.6% of CS 61A students failed, and 16.8% of those in EECS 127, an upper-division optimi...
1 comment
Read more