Skip to main content

2024 Elections: Modi up a steep and slippery slope?

MOHAN GURUSWAMY:

♦️ *2024 Elections: Modi up a steep and slippery slope?*

 

Be it a democracy or a dictatorship, regimes are almost always changed by throwing out the incumbent. The former is called a democratic transition and the latter is inevitably a revolution. Even if it is, as usually is the case, more of the same.

 

India’s electoral process that begins on April 19 will be concluded on June 4 when the results are announced.  Most psephologists, commentators, astrologers and bazar gossips are sanguine that Narendra Modi will be easily re-elected to a third successive term. I do not agree with that sanguinity. I think Modi has a hard hill to climb and the slope may be too steep and slippery for him. Look at the objective reality. In 2019 the BJP won 303 seats or almost 56% of the Lok Sabha with 37.4% of the popular vote. This skew is how it usually is in a first past the post system. Even a minority mandate translates into an overwhelming outcome.  But the problem with the BJP mandate is that it is concentrated in a minority of states. The saffron mandate is restricted almost entirely to the large Hindi speaking states (202/235), Maharashtra (41/48) and Karnataka (25/28). It got 268 out of its 303 in just this concentration.  Winning these states is not the issue for the BJP. Repeating this performance is.

 

The BJP governments in these states have not exactly covered themselves with glory. The party got resoundingly thrashed in the recent state elections in Karnataka where Modi fully deployed his mind spread and headgears, turning it into a Modi vs Congress contest. In the years after 2014, the BJP has turned every election, including for municipal councils, into a Modi vs the rest contest.  It has lost many of these.  For Modi to repeat 2019 we have to assume that the electorate is able to selectively choose Modi for parliament and not for the assemblies.

 

But a lot of murky waters have flowed down the Ganges, Narmada and Godavari since 2019. The effects of demonetization (2016), Covid lockdowns and general mismanagement have set India on a much lower growth trajectory than the one it was between 2004-2014.  In that decade India’s GDP grew from $721 billion to $2.03 trillion or an increase of 182%; while in 2024 it grew to $3.75 trillion from $2.03 trillion or by 86.6%. But lower growth has not slowed down accumulation of wealth with the upper class. Income inequality is among the highest in the world now. At the end of 2022, the wealth Gini coefficient of India stood at 82.3, a significant increase compared to 74.7 in 2000.

 

Joblessness and job dissatisfaction have grown to dominate our economic and social landscape. The ILO’s “India Employment Report 2024” paints a bleak outlook for the 7-8 million youth being added to the labour force each year, with youth accounting for almost 83% of India’s unemployed workforce. Even more distressing is that among the unemployed, the proportion of educated young people, those who have had a secondary level education or higher, has doubled to 65.7% now from 35.2% in 2000. Unemployed graduates (29.1%) outnumber illiterates (3.4%) by 9 times. This underscores the shortage of jobs requiring skills and education.

 

The peasantry is disaffected and has taken to the highways again. While the Jat peasantry of Punjab, Haryana and UP fattened on assured MSP and near 100% procurement wants more, the peasantry in the rest of the country chaffs at state regulations to control prices and hence restrict their incomes.  The fragmentation of land holdings has only added to farmer discontent. Ironically it is widespread even among those who get all and those who get little.

 

That this general mood will not affect Modi’s standing in the saffron belt even somewhat, despite a half-constructed temple in Ayodhya is to be excessively hopeful. People are natural repositories of discontent. Even after Rama returned to Ayodhya it didn’t take people too long to raise uncomfortable questions and Queen Sita had to seek refuge in Valmiki’s ashram.

 

Modi has to deal with discontent and in all likelihood there will be attrition. In each of the saffron states, the BJP won in 2019 with well over 50% of the popular vote. In Gujarat it polled as much as 62%, in UP it currently holds 64 seats with 49.56%, and in MP and Rajasthan it had over 58% each. Only in Assam the BJP did well (9/12) with only 36% of the vote. Even in Bengal where Modi waged a vicious and personalized campaign against Mamata Banerjee to win 18 seats it won 40%.  The picture is clear, there is too little room to climb higher, while a drop could be very precipitous in terms of seats.

 

Presuming Modi will lose support in the BJP’s existing strongholds, where can it hope to make up for the losses? Let's start from the South. It is very unlikely to gain any seats in Tamil Nadu and Kerala – meaning zero will remain zero. It has 25 out of 28 in Karnataka, which is unlikely to be repeated.  The Congress is expected to make strong gains here. The BJP has a recently cobbled up alliance with the TDP, which could mean a couple of seats in AP. It has four in Telangana and is unlikely to add to it. Thus, even a 10% loss in seats in the saffron heartland and a further loss of, say 10-15 in Karnataka will leave it well below the halfway mark. Along with its on and off ally, JD(U), BJP won 39/40 in Bihar.  With the RJD resurgent and a settled alliance with the Congress that record is unlikely to be maintained. The INDIA alliance is tipped to easily do double digits or even 50% of the seats in Bihar.  The AAP/Congress alliance might sweep Delhi’s seven seats. The saffron alliance won 41/48 in Maharashtra. With every party split in the state and with an uninspiring state leadership, Modi alone may not be able to pull all the chesnuts out of the fire.

 

Spread it on a spreadsheet and see how the cookie crumbles. It doesn’t look like BJP is anywhere near 400. Even the halfway mark of 272 looks like a hard climb.

Mohanguru@gmail.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...

Why BJP is opposing the Telangana caste census?

The BJP opposes the Telangana caste census primarily due to concerns about its political motivations, alleging that the Congress party is using it for electoral gain rather than genuine welfare of Backward Classes (BCs)  1 3 .  BJP leaders argue that the census distracts from Congress's unfulfilled promises to BCs and could exacerbate social divisions  2 4 .  Additionally, there are fears within the BJP that a detailed caste enumeration might reveal ongoing upper-caste dominance in politics and society, which could challenge their support base  7 8 . The BJP's main arguments against the caste census include: Political Manipulation : BJP leaders assert that the Congress party is using the caste census for political advantage rather than for the welfare of Backward Classes (BCs), claiming it distracts from unfulfilled promises made to these communities  2 4 . Threat to Hindutva Agenda : The party views the census as a potential challenge to its support base a...

JAI HIND: WHO DO WE OWE IT TO?

Though the origin of Jai Hind is usually ascribed to Chempakaraman  Pillai in 1907, it didn’t have a popular usage till Netaji Bose made it the standard greeting of the INA. How this happened to be has a Hyderabad connection. It is believed by Netaji’s close followers that the slogan "Jai Hind" as coined by Abid Hasan Safrani.   Abid Hasan Safrani  was the son of the soil of Hyderabad in India. His real name was Zainul Abedin Hasan. He preferred to be called Abid Hasan. His parents expired during the British Raj. Before that they had sent him to Germany instead of England for higher studies in Engineering stream. During the that time, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose visited Germany and addressed Indian  prisoners of war & also students and asked them  to join Indian National Army (Azad Hind Fauj). Abid Hasan met him and got inspired by the charisma of Netaji.  He told him that he would join him after finishing his studies. Netaji said tautingly t...