Skip to main content

SC, ST, and OBC students in UPSC 2023


The probability of getting lower Interview Marks with Higher Written Marks is higher for SC, ST, and OBC students in UPSC 2023

Please see the attached graphic, which shows the interview marks got by the Top 50 Written marks in each category.

We took the top 50 written marks in each category and analyzed the impact of interview marks. The results were surprising

For SC category
We took top 50 written marks of SC category and analyzed interview marks.

We noticed disproportionately large number of students got marks in the range of 127-160 marks which was not visible in other category.

Only 1 student got more than 200 marks from SC category. There were very few who were given above 171 marks.

In scheduled category, there is a greater probability of getting lower interview marks if the candidate has scored a higher written marks

For General Category

We took top 50 written marks of General category and analyzed interview marks.

We noticed just 12 students got less than 176 marks.

Disproportionately high number of students got marks between 176 to 196 marks which is not visible in other categories.

In General Category, almost no student got less than 146 marks.

In General category, there is a greater probability of higher interview marks if the candidate has scored higher written marks.

So how come two sets of the same comparable written marks get different interview marks?

I need to conclude that

The probability of getting lower Interview Marks with Higher Written Marks is higher for SC, ST, and OBC students in UPSC

#upsc #interview #sc #st #ews #reservations #merit


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...
Post a Comment
Read more

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...
Post a Comment
Read more

India needs a Second National Capital

Metta Ramarao, IRS (VRS) India needs a Second National Capital till a green field New National Capital is built in the geographical centre of India. Dr B R Ambedkar in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States" published in 1955 has written a full Chaper on "Second Capital for India" While discussing at length justfying the need to go for a second capital has clearly preferred Hyderabad over Kolkata and Mumbai. He did not consider Nagpur. Main reason he brought out in his book is the need to bridge north and south of the country. He recommended Hyderabad as second capital of India. Why we should consider Dr Ambedkar's recommendation: Delhi was central to British India. After partition, Delhi is situated at one corner of India. People from South find it daunting to visit due to distance, weather, language, culture, etc. If Hyderabad is made second capital, it will embrace all southern states. People of South India can come for work easily. Further, if Supreme Court...
Post a Comment
Read more