Skip to main content

JUDGEMENT DAY – NOVEMBER 16 (1992)


 
The Constitutionally mandated (Art.340) Commission for Backward Classes under the leadership of *B.P.Mandal,* namely the Second Backward Classes Commission, submitted the report to the Union Government on 31st December 1980 recommending 27 per cent reservation for Backward Classes in jobs and education as well as in promotion, judiciary and private sector.

On 7th August 1990, saviour of Social Justice *V.P.Singh* as Prime Minister of the country, announced in the Parliament that the Government will implement  27 per cent reservation for OBCs in direct recruitment of central government services and public sector undertakings and G.O. dated 13.8.1990 was issued.

On 25th September 1991, the Congress Government headed by *P.V.Narasimha Rao* issued a modified memorandum to enable the poorer sections in SEBCs (OBCs) to receive benefits of reservation on preferential basis and to provide 10 per cent reservation for economically backward sections of the people not covered by any of the existing schemes of reservation.

Both these OMs were challenged in the Supreme Court (Indra Sawhney Case otherwise also called as Mandal Reservation Case) and got stayed. Finally, after detailed arguments from both sides, the nine Judges Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court by 6-3 majority gave the following judgments on 16.11.1992.

1.    Court upheld the order of V.P.Singh reserving 27 per cent for OBCs.
2. Court rejected as unconstitutional, the 1991 order of Congress government reserving 10 per cent for economically backward sections of the people not covered by any of the existing schemes of reservation.
3. Advanced sections among OBCs (Creamy layer) must be excluded from availing reservation of OBCs.
4.  No reservation in promotion.
5.  Reservation shall not exceed 50 per cent.

After 32 years of its judgement, if we look now, the representation of OBCs in Union Government departments is totally dismal and disappointing.

The court's order is peppered with so many 'ifs' and 'buts' and doses of diffidence that it is extremely unlikely that the entire quota will ever be used up and the policy of reservation will remain only in paper.

Now with implementation of EWS 10 per cent for upper castes, and the Apex Court upholding the Act, the ceiling of 50 per cent has no meaning.

Therefore, every effort by all of us should be made towards total implementation of Mandal Commission Recommendations including 52 per cent reservation for OBCs, abolishing the creamy layer concept, reservation in promotion, judiciary and private section and most importantly, action against officials for failure to comply the order of the Government on implementation of reservation policy.

-G.Karuananidhy
General Secretary,
AIOBC Federation
16.11.2024

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...
Post a Comment
Read more

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...
Post a Comment
Read more

India needs a Second National Capital

Metta Ramarao, IRS (VRS) India needs a Second National Capital till a green field New National Capital is built in the geographical centre of India. Dr B R Ambedkar in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States" published in 1955 has written a full Chaper on "Second Capital for India" While discussing at length justfying the need to go for a second capital has clearly preferred Hyderabad over Kolkata and Mumbai. He did not consider Nagpur. Main reason he brought out in his book is the need to bridge north and south of the country. He recommended Hyderabad as second capital of India. Why we should consider Dr Ambedkar's recommendation: Delhi was central to British India. After partition, Delhi is situated at one corner of India. People from South find it daunting to visit due to distance, weather, language, culture, etc. If Hyderabad is made second capital, it will embrace all southern states. People of South India can come for work easily. Further, if Supreme Court...
Post a Comment
Read more