Skip to main content

IIT Madras Director Faces Backlash for Unsubstantiated Claims on Cow Urine

 IIT Madras Director, Professor V. Kamakoti, has drawn sharp criticism for his recent remarks on the alleged medicinal properties of cow urine. During an address at a "Go Samrakshana Sala" (cow protection shelter) in Chennai, Professor Kamakoti attributed various health benefits to cow urine, including antibacterial, antifungal, and digestive properties. He even cited an anecdote about an ascetic who reportedly cured a high fever by consuming cow urine.

This incident follows a series of instances where IIT faculty members have made controversial statements that lack scientific basis.

  • IIT Mandi Director: In 2023, the IIT Mandi director, Laxmidhar Behera, faced criticism for attributing landslides and cloudbursts in Himachal Pradesh to the consumption of meat.
  • IIT Delhi Professor: Earlier this year, an associate professor at IIT Delhi, Divya Dwivedi, sparked controversy with comments suggesting a future for India without Hinduism.

These incidents raise concerns about the role of academic institutions in promoting scientific temper and critical thinking. Critics argue that such unsubstantiated claims from prominent academic figures can mislead the public and erode trust in higher education. Furthermore, such statements can negatively impact India's international image, particularly among foreign universities and research, institutions, potentially discourage collaborations and student exchanges

The IIT Madras incident has reignited debate on the importance of upholding scientific rigor and academic integrity within institutions of higher learning.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...
Post a Comment
Read more

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...
Post a Comment
Read more

India needs a Second National Capital

Metta Ramarao, IRS (VRS) India needs a Second National Capital till a green field New National Capital is built in the geographical centre of India. Dr B R Ambedkar in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States" published in 1955 has written a full Chaper on "Second Capital for India" While discussing at length justfying the need to go for a second capital has clearly preferred Hyderabad over Kolkata and Mumbai. He did not consider Nagpur. Main reason he brought out in his book is the need to bridge north and south of the country. He recommended Hyderabad as second capital of India. Why we should consider Dr Ambedkar's recommendation: Delhi was central to British India. After partition, Delhi is situated at one corner of India. People from South find it daunting to visit due to distance, weather, language, culture, etc. If Hyderabad is made second capital, it will embrace all southern states. People of South India can come for work easily. Further, if Supreme Court...
Post a Comment
Read more