Skip to main content

India’s Unsung Economic Heroes

In the cacophony of India’s economic discourse, a familiar refrain echoes: private corporations, from Reliance to Tata, are the titans propelling the nation forward, while the "poor and common man" languish as mere bystanders. The media, enamoured of boardroom triumphs, often amplifies this tale. Yet the numbers—stubborn as they are—reveal a more egalitarian truth. India’s $3.94 trillion economy (2024-25, provisional) owes as much to its small farmers and street vendors as to its corporate giants. Far from a one-sided affair, this is a story of symbiosis.

The Toil of the Many
Consider the informal sector, the domain of the "common man"—a sprawling network of labourers, micro-entrepreneurs, and farmers. The Periodic Labour Force Survey of 2022-23, the latest comprehensive tally, puts over 90% of India’s 475 million workers in this category. By January 2025, the e-Shram portal had registered 285 million unorganised souls, with more joining daily. Their economic heft is staggering: roughly 50% of GDP, or $1.97 trillion, flows from informal activity, according to estimates from the International Labour Organization and the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.

Agriculture, the heartbeat of rural India, exemplifies this. Small and marginal farmers—86% of the total, tilling plots under two hectares—produce 70% of the country’s food grains, says the Ministry of Agriculture. In 2023-24, agriculture, forestry, and fishing contributed 18.4% to GDP ($657 billion then, adjusted to $725 billion for 2024-25 with 6.4% growth, per the Economic Survey). Beyond the fields, informal non-farm enterprises—think roadside stalls or construction crews—account for 29.2% of non-agricultural gross value added, per the National Sample Survey Office’s 2022-23 data. This is no trickle; it’s a torrent.

The Poor’s Burden and Boon
The poorest, pegged at 10% of India’s 1.4 billion people (140 million) by the World Bank’s 2024 update, seem marginal in raw GDP terms, their incomes too meagre to register loudly. Yet their labour is the economy’s silent scaffold. Of e-Shram’s 285 million registrants, 94% earn less than $120 a month; 52% toil in fields, 9% on building sites. These hands harvest crops and erect factories, keeping costs low for corporate supply chains. Historical studies suggest informal work boosts formal-sector output by over 20%—a figure likely enduring into 2025. The poor may not fill the exchequer directly, but they enable those who do.

The Corporate Vanguard
Private corporations, meanwhile, are no slouches. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs reckons they contribute 30% of GDP—$1.18 trillion in 2024-25. From steel to software, their imprint is indelible. Tax receipts tell a starker tale: in 2023-24, corporates accounted for 28.1% of revenue, with excise (11%) and customs (5.7%) pushing their share past 70%. Compare that with individual income tax, paid by a mere 3% of Indians (42 million), yielding 26.3%, per the Economic Survey 2024-25. The boardroom’s fiscal clout is undeniable.
Yet this prowess rests on a broader base. The resilience of small enterprises—up 4% in number since 2015-16, despite a 3.2% drop in hired-worker outfits (NSSO)—and the consumption of the bottom 50%, who pay 64% of GST while earning 13% of income (Oxfam 2024), knit the economy together. Corporates thrive not in isolation but atop this foundation.

A Tale of Two Indias
The media’s lens, dazzled by billion-dollar profits—Reliance alone raked in $10 billion in 2023—often blurs this reality. The Economic Survey 2024-25, tabled in January, forecasts 6.4% growth, buoyed by agriculture and services, sectors where the common man reigns. The narrative of corporate omnipotence is compelling but incomplete. India’s economy is dual-engined: half its value springs from the sweat of the many, half its sheen from the ambition of the few. To laud one while ignoring the other is to misread the ledger—and the nation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...

India needs a Second National Capital

Metta Ramarao, IRS (VRS) India needs a Second National Capital till a green field New National Capital is built in the geographical centre of India. Dr B R Ambedkar in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States" published in 1955 has written a full Chaper on "Second Capital for India" While discussing at length justfying the need to go for a second capital has clearly preferred Hyderabad over Kolkata and Mumbai. He did not consider Nagpur. Main reason he brought out in his book is the need to bridge north and south of the country. He recommended Hyderabad as second capital of India. Why we should consider Dr Ambedkar's recommendation: Delhi was central to British India. After partition, Delhi is situated at one corner of India. People from South find it daunting to visit due to distance, weather, language, culture, etc. If Hyderabad is made second capital, it will embrace all southern states. People of South India can come for work easily. Further, if Supreme Court...