Skip to main content

Public Awareness of "Hindu" Identity in Late 19th–Early 20th Century British India

The general public (especially ordinary villagers, lower castes, and tribal communities) in British India during the late 19th and early 20th centuries did not widely or consciously identify as "Hindu" in the modern, unified religious sense prior to or during the early censuses (1872–1911). Identities were far more fluid, local, and sectarian, shaped by caste, village, sect, deity worship, or tribe rather than a broad religious label.

Evidence from Census Reports and Enumerator Experiences

  • Confusing or Ambiguous Responses: Census officials repeatedly noted that many respondents struggled with the religion question. In the 1881 census, enumerators reported widespread ignorance or indifference—people often said they had no religion, belonged to their caste/tribe (e.g., "Meherat" instead of Muslim), or followed local practices without a label. Provincial reports described "great prejudice" among enumerators and respondents, with many unable to state a religion clearly.
  • Default Classification: "Hindu" was largely a residual category. Anyone not explicitly Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, Parsi, or animist/tribal was often classified as Hindu during tabulation, even if self-identification was vague (e.g., Kabirpanthi, Satnami, or tribal groups). Officials like those in Madras (1881) objected to using "Hindu" broadly, as it didn't fit southern practices.
  • Syncretic and Local Identities: Groups like Kolis (worshipping Hindu idols and Christian Trinity) or Kunbis (following Hindu and Muslim rituals) blurred lines. Tribal/aboriginal people sometimes claimed "Hindu" when pressed but were often recorded variably based on enumerator bias.
  • Pre-Census Fluidity: Scholars note that pre-colonial identities were "fuzzy"—overlapping Hindu-Muslim practices were common, with little sense of exclusive communal boundaries among the masses.

Gradual Shift in Consciousness

While ordinary people lacked a strong "Hindu" self-identification initially, the censuses contributed to raising awareness:

  • Published numbers introduced majority/minority concepts, sparking elite anxieties (e.g., "dying Hindu race" fears in Bengal/Punjab).
  • By the early 20th century, reform movements (Arya Samaj, Hindu Mahasabha) and communal politics mobilized around census data, spreading numerical consciousness via newspapers/pamphlets.
  • Some communities strategically responded (e.g., declaring Hindi to assert Hindu identity in 1901–1911 language debates).

In summary, for most common people in this period, "Hindu" was not a primary or conscious identity—it emerged more solidly through colonial enumeration, elite mobilization, and political contestation, hardening boundaries that were previously porous. This process laid foundations for modern Hindu communal consciousness.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...
Post a Comment
Read more

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...
Post a Comment
Read more

India needs a Second National Capital

Metta Ramarao, IRS (VRS) India needs a Second National Capital till a green field New National Capital is built in the geographical centre of India. Dr B R Ambedkar in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States" published in 1955 has written a full Chaper on "Second Capital for India" While discussing at length justfying the need to go for a second capital has clearly preferred Hyderabad over Kolkata and Mumbai. He did not consider Nagpur. Main reason he brought out in his book is the need to bridge north and south of the country. He recommended Hyderabad as second capital of India. Why we should consider Dr Ambedkar's recommendation: Delhi was central to British India. After partition, Delhi is situated at one corner of India. People from South find it daunting to visit due to distance, weather, language, culture, etc. If Hyderabad is made second capital, it will embrace all southern states. People of South India can come for work easily. Further, if Supreme Court...
Post a Comment
Read more