The Constitution's Forgotten Promise
Article 51A(h) of the Indian Constitution places a
remarkable obligation on every citizen: to develop the scientific temper,
humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform. This is not a guideline. It
is a fundamental duty — as binding in its moral weight as any right we
jealously claim.
And yet, in 2026, India is watching that promise drown
in a flood of sacred ash, miracle water, and prime-time astrology.
We are a nation that sends spacecraft to the Moon and
Mars. We produce world-class mathematicians, biologists, and engineers. And
simultaneously, we are a nation where stadium-sized crowds prostrate before men
who claim to materialise gold from thin air, cure cancer with cow urine, and
commune directly with the divine — for a fee.
This is not a contradiction we can afford to be proud
of. It is a crisis.
The Godman Industrial Complex
Let us call it what it is: an industry.
The baba economy in India is worth hundreds of thousands
of crores of rupees. It runs hospitals, universities, television channels,
political action committees, land banks, and product lines. It is vertically
integrated superstition — from the village faith healer charging fifty rupees
for a taaviz, all the way up to the air-conditioned ashram empires with foreign
exchange accounts and celebrity devotees.
The godman is not a relic of pre-modern India stumbling
awkwardly into the present. He is a thoroughly modern entrepreneur. He
understands branding. He understands the media cycle. He understands that
desperation — from illness, poverty, infertility, grief, fear of failure — is a
reliable and renewable market.
What does he sell? Certainty. In a world of overwhelming
complexity and institutional failure, he offers a direct line to cosmic order.
No waiting list. No copayment. No peer review. Just surrender, and be saved.
The tragedy is not that people are foolish. The tragedy
is that we have failed them — with broken public healthcare, underfunded
schools, and a State that has increasingly chosen to patronise the baba rather
than challenge him.
When the State Becomes a Devotee
In a healthy democracy, governments would be the first
line of defence against exploitative superstition. They would enforce consumer
protection laws against miracle cures. They would prosecute fraud when
"faith healing" kills children. They would fund scientific education
and rationalist outreach.
Instead, over the past decade, India has watched its
political leadership normalise — and actively celebrate — the very ecosystem it
should regulate.
Ministers inaugurate yagnas for rainfall. Official
government events feature astrologers. Pseudoscientific claims — about ancient
Indian aeroplanes, genetic science in the Mahabharata, cow dung as radiation
shield — are made not by fringe cranks but by sitting cabinet ministers and
university vice-chancellors. When the State begins to confuse mythology with
history and ritual with medicine, it does not merely embarrass itself. It licenses
irrationality from the top down.
The rise of radical right-wing Hindutva politics has
deepened this rot in a specific way: it has made challenging superstition feel
like an act of cultural treachery. To question a godman is to attack Hindu
tradition. To demand evidence is to be "anti-national" or
"Western." Rationalism has been repackaged as colonialism — a sleight
of hand so politically effective that even educated, liberal Indians hesitate
before they speak.
This is the real achievement of the baba-political
nexus: it has made silence feel like respect.
The Victims We Don't Count
We celebrate when a godman is jailed. We rarely pause to
count the bodies that preceded the arrest.
There is the child with treatable leukemia whose parents
were told by a miracle-monger to stop chemotherapy and drink herbal decoctions
instead. There is the young Dalit woman who was branded, beaten, or sexually
assaulted as "treatment" for spirit possession. There is the farmer
who sold his land to fund an ashram's maha-yagna promising good rains, and lost
everything. There is the mentally ill person locked in a dargah or temple
cellar, chained and starved, while the family waits for divine intervention rather
than psychiatric care.
These are not rare exceptions. These are weekly
occurrences across India, most of which never make national news because the
victims are poor, rural, lower-caste, or female — the same demographics that
organised religion and superstition have always preyed upon most efficiently.
When we treat the fight against superstition as an
intellectual exercise — a debate between modernity and tradition — we erase
those bodies. Scientific temperament is not an elitist luxury. It is a
survival issue for the most vulnerable Indians.
The Rationalists Who Paid With Their Lives
India's rationalist tradition is not foreign. It is
ancient, deep, and heroic.
From the Lokayata philosophers who rejected Vedic
authority and demanded material evidence, to Phule, Periyar, and Ambedkar who
dismantled caste superstition with brutal clarity, to Nehru who explicitly
championed the scientific temper in nation-building — there has always been an
Indian counter-tradition of rigorous, fearless doubt.
That tradition has modern martyrs.
Narendra Dabholkar — doctor, activist, founder of
the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti — spent decades running
campaigns against black magic, human sacrifice, and miracle fraud. He was shot
dead in Pune in 2013, while out for his morning walk. He had been fighting for
an anti-superstition law for twenty years.
Govind Pansare, trade union leader and
rationalist, was shot in 2015. M.M. Kalburgi, scholar and critic of idol
worship, was shot at his doorstep in 2015. Gauri Lankesh, journalist,
was shot in 2017.
These were not random crimes. They were assassinations
with a message: question the sacred, and die.
The message was received. Self-censorship among
rationalists, journalists, and academics has grown measurably. This is the
intended effect. When you cannot silence the argument, you silence the person
making it.
We owe these martyrs more than candlelight vigils. We
owe them the courage to continue what they started — loudly, publicly, and
without apology.
What Scientific Temperament Actually Means
It is important to be clear: scientific temperament is
not the worship of scientists. It is not the uncritical acceptance of whatever
wears a lab coat. It is not hostility to spirituality or inner life.
Scientific temperament is a habit of mind: the
willingness to ask how do we know this? It is comfort with uncertainty.
It is the insistence that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
It is the understanding that tradition and antiquity are not, by themselves,
proof of truth.
Applied to daily life, it means:
- Asking for evidence before
accepting a cure, a prophecy, or a diagnosis — whether from a doctor, a
godman, or a government.
- Recognising exploitation
dressed as devotion — the baba who demands money, land, silence, or sex in
exchange for spiritual favour.
- Teaching children that "I
don't know" is an honest and honourable answer, and that questions
are not disrespectful.
- Demanding accountability from
institutions — religious, political, and scientific alike.
This is not Western. Aryabhata demanded it. Brahmagupta
demanded it. The Buddha demanded it when he told his followers not to accept
teaching on the basis of tradition or the authority of a teacher, but only
after direct examination and experience.
India's own intellectual inheritance demands it.
What Must Be Done
The scale of the problem demands responses at multiple
levels.
Legally: India needs robust, enforceable
anti-superstition legislation — not just in Maharashtra and Karnataka, but
nationally. The Karnataka Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices
and Black Magic Act exists. It should be a template, not an exception.
Fraudulent miracle cures must be prosecuted under consumer protection law
without exception, regardless of the religious identity of the seller.
Educationally: Science education in India teaches
facts but rarely teaches scientific thinking. Curricula must be
redesigned to centre inquiry, evidence-evaluation, and logical fallacies.
Children should learn to spot pseudoscience — in advertising, in WhatsApp
forwards, in political speeches — as a core life skill.
In media: A press that treats astrologers as news
anchors, broadcasts "miracle" cures during health crises, and gives
godmen free prime time without scrutiny is complicit in the harm. Media
literacy campaigns and editorial standards that treat extraordinary claims with
appropriate scepticism are not optional luxuries.
In civil society: Organisations like PUCL,
rationalist associations, women's groups, and Dalit rights movements must be
supported, funded, and amplified. The people most harmed by superstition are
usually the people with the least access to legal or medical recourse. Community-level
rationalist organising is irreplaceable.
In culture: Poets, filmmakers, comedians, and
artists have always been the sharpest tools against superstition. From Kabir to
Periyar to Jaswant Singh Kanwal — satire, song, and story reach where lectures
cannot. Cultural production that celebrates doubt, questions authority, and
laughs at pomposity is not frivolous. It is essential.
A Nation at a Crossroads
There is a vision of India in which our ancient capacity
for philosophical inquiry meets our modern scientific capability — in which we
produce not just engineers and doctors, but citizens who think critically,
question power, and refuse to be exploited in the name of the sacred.
That India exists. It exists in the quiet work of the
ASHA worker who persuades a family to vaccinate their child instead of taking
it to the temple. It exists in the schoolteacher in a government school who
explains to students why eclipses are not inauspicious. It exists in the
consumer who asks the Ayurvedic medicine company for clinical trial data. It
exists in the journalist who asks the self-declared godman: show me the
miracle.
That India is fighting for its life against well-funded,
politically protected, deeply institutionalised irrationality.
The fight for scientific temperament is not a fight
against religion. It is a fight for human dignity — the dignity of not being
fooled, not being exploited, not being silenced when we ask a reasonable
question.
Article 51A(h) is not a relic. It is a call to arms.
Answer it.
"The scientific temper is not just for
scientists. It is the democratic mind at work — refusing to be governed by
fear, superstition, or the manufactured authority of the self-appointed
holy."
అడుగు, ఆలోచించు, నిరూపించు
చీకటి తొలగింపుమా — జ్ఞాన జ్యోతి వెలిగించుమా
అజ్ఞానపు సంకెళ్ళు తెంపుమా — సత్య మార్గం చూపుమా
భయమును పోద్రోలుమా — ప్రశ్నించే ధైర్యమిమ్ముమా
మూఢ నమ్మకం తొలగించుమా — వివేకం మనసులో నిలుపుమా
Dispel the darkness — kindle the lamp of knowledge
Break the chains of ignorance — show the path of truth
Drive away fear — give the courage to question
Remove blind belief — let discernment settle in the mind
ప్రకృతే మా గురువు — పరీక్షే మా పూజ
సాక్ష్యమే మా దేవుడు — సత్యమే మా మోక్షం
Nature is our teacher — experiment is our worship
Evidence is our god — truth is our liberation
అడగనివాడు అంధుడు
ఆలోచించనివాడు బానిస
నిరూపించనివాడు నమ్మకస్థుడు కాడు —
ప్రశ్నించేవాడే నిజమైన జ్ఞాని.
One who does not ask is blind.
One who does not think is a slave.
One who does not test is no believer in truth —
Only one who questions is a true knower.
Comments
Post a Comment