Skip to main content

AI was supposed to crush India’s IT industry. It hasn’t — yet.

By Chuppala Nagesh Bhushan

The old Silicon Valley joke that “AI” stood for “Actually Indians” is colliding with reality. Tasks that once kept armies of coders and process workers busy in Bangalore and Hyderabad are exactly the ones generative AI handles best.

Why it matters:
India’s IT services sector employs more than 5 million people, generates over $300 billion in revenue, and remains one of the country’s biggest sources of exports and middle-class jobs. A sharp disruption would ripple through the economy.

The big picture:
For decades, Indian firms thrived on labor arbitrage — delivering software development, testing, and routine back-office work (payroll, accounting, support) at lower cost. Those categories are now highly automatable. Coding assistants write and debug code. AI agents handle repetitive business processes. The logical fear: mass job losses and a hit to India’s growth model.

What we’re seeing instead (as of mid-2026):

  • Industry revenue is still growing (Nasscom projected more than $315 billion for the year ending March 2026).
  • Share prices of major IT firms have been volatile on AI scare stories, but the sector has not collapsed.
  • Companies are slowing entry-level hiring more than firing existing staff.
  • Demand is shifting toward engineers who can work with AI tools rather than pure body-shop coding.

Yes, but:
The pressure is real. Routine, well-defined work is shrinking. Campus recruitment has slowed sharply. Workers without AI-related skills face tougher prospects. Firms that fail to move up the value chain risk being left behind.

The bottom line:
AI has not wiped out India’s IT industry the way the hype predicted. It is forcing a painful but familiar transition: from volume of low-cost labor to higher-value work that combines human judgment with machines. The winners will be those who adapt fastest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself.......

Helen Mirren once said: Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective. Because if not, there's absolutely no point. Not every argument is worth your energy. Sometimes, no matter how clearly you express yourself, the other person isn’t listening to understand—they’re listening to react. They’re stuck in their own perspective, unwilling to consider another viewpoint, and engaging with them only drains you. There’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate. A conversation with someone who is open-minded, who values growth and understanding, can be enlightening—even if you don’t agree. But trying to reason with someone who refuses to see beyond their own beliefs? That’s like talking to a wall. No matter how much logic or truth you present, they will twist, deflect, or dismiss your words, not because you’re wrong, but because they’re unwilling to see another side. Maturity is...

The battle against caste: Phule and Periyar's indomitable legacy

In the annals of India's social reform, two luminaries stand preeminent: Jotirao Phule and E.V. Ramasamy, colloquially known as Periyar. Their endeavours, ensconced in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue to sculpt the contemporary struggle against the entrenched caste system. Phule's educational renaissance Phule, born in 1827, was an intellectual vanguard who perceived education as the ultimate equaliser. He inaugurated the inaugural school for girls from lower castes in Pune, subverting the Brahminical hegemony that had long monopolized erudition. His Satyashodhak Samaj endeavoured to obliterate caste hierarchies through radical social reform. His magnum opus, "Gulamgiri" (Slavery), delineated poignant parallels between India's caste system and the subjugation of African-Americans, igniting a discourse on caste as an apparatus of servitude. Periyar's rationalist odyssey Periyar, born in 1879, assumed the mantle of social reform through the Dravidian moveme...

AI & Higher Education: The Empty Classroom

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE & HIGHER EDUCATION The Empty Classroom When students outsource learning to AI and companies cut the engineers who know better, both ends of the talent pipeline fray at once. India is not watching from a safe distance. Chuppala Nagesh Bhushan At the University of California, Berkeley, something unremarkable happened in spring 2026: a professor held office hours. The unremarkable part was that nobody came. Dan Garcia, who teaches CS 10, a broad introductory computing course popularly called “The Beauty and Joy of Computing,” found his calendar conspicuously clear at the very moment his gradebook became conspicuously alarming. Of the students who sat CS 10’s final examination, 35.3% received an F—five times the historical norm of roughly 7%. Two other courses in Berkeley’s elite Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences department suffered similarly: 10.6% of CS 61A students failed, and 16.8% of those in EECS 127, an upper-division optimi...